
It’s hard to know exactly what a career entails with no direct experience in the field. And walking into the third advertising & public relations class I’d ever taken four months ago, I had little clue what I was getting myself into.
In my first post on this blog, I mentioned that PR is a dynamic and creative profession that requires a commitment to relationship-building. While I still stand by these points, I think that I failed to attest to the tedious process of research and evaluation that goes hand in hand with any PR activity.
After completing a full campaign planbook of my own in CAP 220 across the past semester, I have come to more fully appreciate the amount of meticulous research and planning that goes into every PR campaign. You could have the most creative idea in the world, or be the best communicator around. However, for a campaign to be truly successful, it must be backed up by research that proves the logic of the idea. Even though it takes a lot of time and concentration to comb through secondary sources, conduct surveys, and hold focus groups, the data that these methods reveal make writing actual tactics that much easier. When there is an issue to be addressed, good research can almost solve the problem for you by showing you exactly what your target population wants and needs.
In my own research for the campaign plan I prepared for the Grand Valley State University Division of Inclusion and Equity, I had no idea how long it would take me to synthesize the materials I found. Finding the research was one thing, and extracting meaning from it was quite another. I also learned that it was extremely important (and harder than I expected) not to let preconceived notions or biases creep into my research report. Many times throughout the process, I found myself wanting to prescribe action based on a simple feeling I had about the atmosphere on GVSU’s campus, or on a complaint I had heard from one or two friends. But I now know that a key part of the PR planning process is thorough, well-developed research. And it takes time to do that well.
Evaluation too is a step that I discounted in my initial overview of public relations back in August. It can be really hard to evaluate the outcomes of some public relations campaigns, because there just isn’t a standard measurement system put in place for brand awareness or public attitudes (and truly how can there be?). When something is difficult to calculate or gauge, it’s easy to cast it aside as unimportant. And sadly, many business leaders fail to recognize the value of quality evaluation in public relations just as I did.
While working on my campaign, I came to understand exactly how crucial quality evaluation is when I went to recommend steps for how to evaluate the objectives, strategies, and tactics I suggested for my client to carry out. I needed a clearly defined starting place if my client was to assess how well my proposed ideas helped meet the overall goals and objectives. The only problem? There was no data for me to start with! Because the Division of Inclusion and Equity had failed to keep good records about student awareness of their services, it made it much more difficult to determine how my campaign plan would be evaluated. Consequently, it taught me that consistent and quality evaluation is a crucial part in helping the PR machine to run smoothly.
Coming into CAP 220, I knew that PR was changeable and multifaceted. I knew that it involved strategic thinking and a willingness to “think outside the box” when coming up with solutions. But with the knowledge I gained through the class and especially through working on the campaign book for the GVSU Division of Inclusion and Equity, I’d like to amend my prior assessment of the public relations field. Public relations is a cycle and a process. It is often a messy process. And within it, careful research, creative and strategic planning, and continual evaluation and improvement serve as the best way to drive effective communication and relationship-building.






